WEKO3
アイテム
ジョン・ハートリー事件：アヘン統制をめぐる1870年代の日英間の紛議に関する考察
https://otemae.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2157
https://otemae.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/215749fbf7cd-d3f2-4377-98ef-ef13893cf44c
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
The John Hartley Cases : Examining the 1870s Anglo‒Japanese Dispute over Opium Control (1.5 MB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2019-10-31 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | ジョン・ハートリー事件：アヘン統制をめぐる1870年代の日英間の紛議に関する考察 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | The John Hartley Cases : Examining the 1870s Anglo‒Japanese Dispute over Opium Control | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 19th century｜Narcotic Drugs｜ International Law｜ Extraterritoriality｜ British Gentlemanly Capitalism | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 著者 |
尾﨑, 耕司
× 尾﨑, 耕司
|
|||||||||
| 著者別名 |
OZAKI, Koji
× OZAKI, Koji
|
|||||||||
| Abstract | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | This paper discusses the process through which the Japanese government took control of the opium trade. Specifically, it focuses on the John Hartley cases, in which the customs authority at Yokohama accused a British wholesale druggist, John Hartley, in 1877 and 1878, of smuggling opium. The judgements in the two cases issued by Hiram Shaw Wilkinson, especially the judgement in the first case that found Hartley not guilty, led to diplomatic tension between Japan and Britain. The present paper draws an overall picture of the Hartley cases by investigating them from diverse perspectives, including a shift in British diplomatic policy. The first section discusses the conditions of opium control prior to the Hartley cases, beginning with the Tokugawa era. An outline of the Hartley cases and the negotiations concerning them between the Japanese and British governments is presented in the second and third sections. The fourth section focuses on international law theory in the latter half of the nineteenth century and illustrates that British jurists adopted a new theory of international law theory, whereas the extraterritoriality system that formed the basis of Wilkinson’s judgements was becoming old‒fashioned. Finally, the fifth and sixth sections discuss the essential influence that the Hartley cases exerted upon the diplomatic relationship between Britain and Japan. Both sections explain the end of the Hartley cases or, more correctly, the establishment of the Japanese state monopolization of opium and the end of Harry Parkes’ leadership in Britain’s diplomacy with Japan. Additionally, to explain the change in British diplomacy towards East Asia in more detail, Appendix discusses the British extraterritoriality court regime in China and Japan. Specifically, it focuses on a controversy that arose over the revision of the China and Japan Order in Council of 1865. By examining the outcome of this controversy, it is possible to perceive more accurately the reasons why the Japanese government could establish its own state jurisdiction over opium control in that period. | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
大手前大学論集 en : Otemae Journal 巻 19, p. 015-093, 発行日 2019-10-31 |
|||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 大手前大学 | |||||||||
| 出版者(英) | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Otemae University | |||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1882-644X | |||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 2100000227 | |||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
